A modern setting for Battlefield 6 is the most likely choice for a time period. World War 2 hype/interest died off pretty quickly after 2018, and Battlefield 5 already touched on WW2 so the franchise will likely be moving on to something new. Some of the most popular Battlefield games like Bad Company and Battlefield 3/4 were also based on modern combat, so coming back to the 21st century would be a safe bet. Despite the trite comparison, it is worth noting that Call of Duty: Modern Warfare has seen great success in returning to one of that franchise's most popular time periods as w
For Battlefield to reignite the "who's better" arguments from its past, the franchise will need to seriously focus on what used to be the game's signature identity. Destructible environments have been a staple in Battlefield thanks to the graphically impressive physics in the Frostbite engine. It's never been taken out of the game per se, but with each new release the destruction has been taken out of the spotlight. Destruction was huge for Bad Company and Bad Company 2 because it was both free-flowing and integral to the map design. Battlefield 3 introduced "Levolution" to try and mix up the mechanic, but in turn made destruction much more linear and predictable. Reinventing a more unpredictable destruction system would be the perfect way to bring back classic Battlefield in a brand new fo
A modern setting is a good way for Battlefield to create some free marketing for a few reasons. Games set in modern times tend to stir up more controversy due to their portrayals of violence, which means more headlines and time on the news. That translates to more eyeballs and more sales, even if that was never the intention for those reporting on controversial aspects of the game. A modern setting is also bound to draw comparisons to Modern Warfare, which is another way to market the game without spending a penny on advertisements, as comparison videos are bound to flood YouTube whenever a trailer relea
Team composition and/or dedicated roles in Call of Duty multiplayer is a very rare thing. Average players will stick to their favorite guns and perks in Modern Warfare , and the match will play out to various results. It's a highly open-ended approach that's proved to be the boon of the franchise thus far, but Battlefield handles things a bit more traditiona
Call of Duty , despite being relatively on top of its game in the past year, will need to determine how it's going to shake things up for its annual release. Modern Warfare added a lot of different changes that made the game very similar to Battlefield , especially with the revamp of the Ground War multiplayer mode. But Call of Duty could run into an issue if Battlefield is able to follow up with its own core modes that ends up being a better version of Ground War. Black Ops 4 introduced Blackout as its standout mode to great acclaim, but with Warzone out and continually boasting huge player numbers, 2020's Call of Duty wouldn't want to compete with that . This year's Call of Duty will need to figure out what its core difference will be this year, and Zombies can only carry Treyarch so
Without a doubt, it'll be interesting to see where the Battlefield franchise goes next. There are plenty of possibilities as to what the next entry will look like, but another modern game feels like a good way to kick off the next generation of Battlefield games. There's been an incredibly long period of growth for the franchise, and while it's had its ups and downs, it seems like it may soon be headed in the right direction. Only time will tell, but fans should have something to look forward to on the horizon. It may be a bit before fans actually learn what that is, but, hopefully, it's something they've been waiting
For EA, putting Battlefield back into a modern setting may also prove to be a way to win back some fans. Leading up to the reveal of Battlefield 5 , there was a large part of the fanbase hoping for a game set in modern times. This is in large part due to the freedom it carries with it. There tends to be a larger, more diverse arsenal of weapons to play around with, not to mention a better selection of boats, tanks, fighter jets, and helicopters, all of which lead to combat that feels like it's happening on a much grander sc
For all the great success that Battlefield 1 brought to EA's flagship shooter, Battlefield 5 failed to capitalize on that momentum. As for Call of Duty , Black Ops 4 still performed considerably well and now Modern Warfare and Warzone are even better. To many this debate has been put on hold, but Battlefield has made a resurgence from a poor title before. Both series are poised for their next entries over the course of this next year of releases, meaning this debate could come b
Of course, the Battlefield franchise could surprise fans with something completely new for view battlefield2042hq.com the series. Perhaps not as outlandish Battlefield Hardline , but something like a completely new time period or setting. There's still a variety of conflicts throughout world history that many games, not just Battlefield , still haven't tackled in a video game. Conflicts like the American Civil War, the Korean War, and the modern 20th century Middle Eastern conflicts come to mind. Any one of those wars would be a wild departure for the series thus far, but would be incredibly unique. It would give a chance for players to get to know some of the lesser conflicts in world history that are worth know